转：取消国庆长假，有何震惊？ [复制链接]

      http://202.194.15.192/article/0.php?pid=6349664
      取消国庆长假，有何震惊？

http://www.online.sdu.edu.cn/ 2009-09-23 14:51:50 学生在线©

　　近日有人在猫扑网发了题为“震惊！山东大学取消国庆假期”的帖子。其主要内容为：在祖国六十周年华诞之际，举国欢庆，大家以各种各样的方式庆祝祖国母亲的生日。按照国务院的通知，今年十一长假延长为8天，人们大多为此次的假期做好了打算，或出行旅游走亲访友，或与家人在一起共享天伦之乐，总之，大家都准备好了享受一个开心愉快的假期。但此时也出现了一些不和谐的音符，山东大学学校办公室发布通知，取消今年的国庆假期。

　　的确，2009年9月21到22日，山大党委学生工作部多次下发通知，按照学校统一部署决定，今年国庆长假取消。但是这有何“不和谐”？又有何震惊呢？

　　从帖子的内容看，所谓的“震惊”，可能来自发帖人自身假期计划被打乱而导致的心里预期落差，抑或因其他某些高校并未采取此项措施而造成的对比反差。再进一步分析可知，他的震惊还应该来自以下几方面：

　　一是“震惊”于山东大学预防甲流疫情的举措。为什么假期会被取消？其主要原因是为防止因假期大规模人员流动引发甲型H1N1流感疫情。目前全国防控甲型 H1N1流感病毒的形势严峻，聚集性病例数上升得比较快，国内已有多所学校爆发甲流，加之正处秋冬季流感高发期，学校开学放假等一系列活动更造成人口聚集，导致感染传播风险加大。在疫情如此肆意蔓延的时刻，山东大学率先用取消假期来防止人口集聚带来的风险似乎也没什么错，反倒是学校本着“以人为本的原则”更多为同学着想的结果，所以大多数人认为此举动很正常，无“震惊”可言。

　　二是“震惊”于认为学校这样做侵害学生法定假期的休息权利。对于这一点，他大可不必“震惊”，因为通知上明确指出，本学期的教学工作前移一周，加上十月一日，十月三日下午以及其他正常公休日，也就是说假期的总时间并未减少，只是往后推迟了。

　　三是“震惊”于这个通知下达得过于突然，说取消就取消了。他或许不知道，各学院在此提前一周左右陆续下达延缓订票的通知，并且绝大多数同学对此无异议，况且在全国加强疫情防控的危急形势下，采取这样的紧急措施也是可以理解的。

　　四可能是为他看不到祖国60周年国庆阅兵、过不了回家团聚的中秋佳节而“震惊”。这也不用太过忧虑，校方为此已经安排好了，在此期间除了要严格执行《山东大学甲型H1N1流感防控工作方案（试行）》文件要求，严格学生请销假制度外，学校会积极组织学生收看国庆大典，共同迎接新中国60华诞的到来。同时通过中秋班会、晚会等丰富多彩的形式，引导学生共同度过一个喜庆祥和的中秋佳节。

　　山大取消国庆长假，何必震惊？作为一名高素质的大学生，在特殊关头更应该审时度势，以大局为重，不应该因个人的蝇头微利斤斤计较，何况学校的 “取消国庆长假”只是推迟假期的教学调整，并没有给同学造成具体损失。我们作为有思想重事实的人，对于这种在网上写帖子发牢骚的现象，也应当明辨是非，正所谓少年智则国智，我们的理性冷静，同时也是社会的稳定安康。

没见有不一样的
不都是赞成吗

哪个校区感染了把那个校区隔离就行了啊，干吗牵扯到整个山大？（顺便问一下威海分校也要上课吗？）要以大局为重也不能就只山大，所有济南高校都要以大局为重啊！

引自WHO网站

Should I take an antiviral now just in case I catch the new virus?
No. You should only take an antiviral, such as oseltamivir or zanamivir, if your health care provider advises you to do so. Individuals should not buy medicines to prevent or fight this new influenza without a prescription, and they should exercise caution in buying antivirals over the internet.


Is it safe to travel?
Yes. WHO is not recommending travel restrictions related to the outbreak of the influenza A(H1N1) virus. Today, global travel is commonplace and large numbers of people move around the world for business and leisure. Limiting travel and imposing travel restrictions would have very little effect on stopping the virus from spreading, but would be highly disruptive to the global community.

Influenza A(H1N1) has already been confirmed in many parts of the world. The global response now focuses on minimizing the impact of the virus through the rapid identification of cases, and providing patients with appropriate medical care, rather than on stopping its spread internationally.

Although identifying signs and symptoms of influenza in travellers can help track the path of the outbreak, it will not reduce the spread of influenza, as the virus can be transmitted from person to person before the onset of symptoms.

Scientific research based on mathematical modelling shows that restricting travel would be of limited or no benefit in stopping the spread of disease. Historical records of previous influenza pandemics, as well as experience with SARS, validate this.




Does WHO recommend screenings at country entry and exit points to detect if ill people are travelling?
No. We do not believe entry and exit screenings would work to reduce the spread of this disease. However country-level measures to respond to a public health risk are the decision of national authorities, under the International Health Regulations 2005.

Countries that adopt measures that significantly interfere with international traffic (e.g. delaying an airplane passenger for more than 24 hours, or refusing country entry or departure to a traveller) must provide WHO with the public health reasoning and evidence for their actions. WHO will follow up with all of its Member countries on such matters.

Travellers should always be treated with dignity and respect for their human rights.

现在越来越多的学校取消长假了

坚决拥护小明给每个宿舍发一个电视机看国庆阅兵

坚决支持小明给每位同学发一个以上A里或者好利来的蛋黄月饼

这种时候需要淡定
得是理解啊~~

不过医院的老师来不来上课就不一定了，毕竟他们那是放假了的

很平静。