切换到宽版
  • 18510阅读
  • 16回复

[杏林风采]唉,阜外医院顾东风教授刚刚发了JAMA [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线merck
 
发帖
7064
啄木币
5576
鲜花
1074
只看楼主 倒序阅读 使用道具 0楼 发表于: 2006-02-22
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/295/7/776
Vol. 295 No. 7, February 15, 2006   Featured Link

Body Weight and Mortality Among Men and Women in China
Dongfeng Gu, MD, MSc; Jiang He, MD, PhD; Xiufeng Duan, MD; Kristi Reynolds, PhD, MPH; Xigui Wu, MD; Jing Chen, MD; Guangyong Huang, MD; Chung-Shiuan Chen, MS; Paul K. Whelton, MD, MSc


JAMA. 2006;295:776-783.

ABSTRACT  

Context The effect of underweight and obesity on mortality has not been well characterized in Asian populations.

Objective To examine the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in Chinese adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective cohort study in a nationally representative sample of 169 871 Chinese men and women aged 40 years or older. Data on body weight and covariables were obtained at a baseline examination in 1991 using a standard protocol. Follow-up evaluation was conducted in 1999-2000, with a response rate of 93.4% (n = 158 666).

Main Outcome Measures Body mass index and all-cause mortality.

Results After excluding those participants with missing body weight or height values, 154 736 adults were included in the analysis. After adjustment for age, sex, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, education, geographic region (north vs south), and urbanization (urban vs rural), a U-shaped association between BMI and all-cause mortality was observed (P<.001). Using those participants with a BMI of 24.0 to 24.9 as the reference group, the relative risks of all-cause mortality across categories of BMI were 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-1.77) for BMI less than 18.5, 1.31 (95% CI, 1.22-1.41) for BMI 18.5 to 19.9, 1.20 (95% CI, 1.11-1.29) for BMI 20.0 to 20.9, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.04-1.21) for BMI 21.0 to 21.9, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.03-1.20) for BMI 22.0 to 22.9, 1.09 (95% CI, 1.01-1.19) for BMI 23.0 to 23.9, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92-1.08) for BMI 25.0 to 26.9, 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06-1.24) for BMI 27.0 to 29.9, and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.16-1.42) for BMI 30.0 or more. The U-shaped association existed even after excluding participants who were current or former smokers, heavy alcohol drinkers, or who had prevalent chronic illness at the baseline examination, or who died during the first 3 years of follow-up. A similar association was observed between BMI and mortality from cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other causes.

Conclusions Our results indicate that both underweight and obesity were associated with increased mortality in the Chinese adult population. Furthermore, our findings support the use of a single common recommendation for defining overweight and obesity among all racial and ethnic groups.


Corresponding Authors: Dongfeng Gu, MD, MSc, Division of Population Genetics and Prevention, Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital, 167 Beilishi Rd, Beijing 100037, China (gudongfeng@vip.sina.com) or Jiang He, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St, Suite 2000, New Orleans, LA 70112 (jhe@tulane.edu).
评价一下你浏览此帖子的感受

精彩

感动

搞笑

开心

愤怒

无聊

灌水
离线浅儿
发帖
558
啄木币
1368
鲜花
14
只看该作者 1楼 发表于: 2006-02-22
不懂
离线merck
发帖
7064
啄木币
5576
鲜花
1074
只看该作者 2楼 发表于: 2006-02-22
JAMA是《美国医学会杂志》简称,是仅次于NEJM(新英格兰医学杂志)的世界权威医学杂志,与《柳叶刀》(Lancet),《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)号称世界四大权威综合医学杂志。
阜外医院顾东风教授能在JAMA发表该文,说明其心血管分子流行病方面做出了重要的,为世界医学界认可的工作。
离线guodon
发帖
2656
啄木币
5819
鲜花
374
只看该作者 3楼 发表于: 2006-03-20
merk为什么要“唉”呢?
一个同学在顾东风的小组里,他们的确很牛的。
离线merck
发帖
7064
啄木币
5576
鲜花
1074
只看该作者 4楼 发表于: 2006-03-20
那边分子流行病很强的,JAMA,LANCET都有了。“唉”代表山医压力大啊。“第一篇“都让人家拿走了,2006年的”第一篇“也让人拿走了,JAMA,NEJM。
离线linana
发帖
2205
啄木币
7130
鲜花
538
只看该作者 5楼 发表于: 2006-03-20
NEJM是偶像哈,我老板的老板发过一篇。不过不是国内的
离线merck
发帖
7064
啄木币
5576
鲜花
1074
只看该作者 6楼 发表于: 2006-03-20
在国外发NEJM的不少,毕竟人家是周刊。
国内独立发的很少。今年南方医院肾内侯凡凡发了一篇,还是相当牛的。
离线liu_redsnow
发帖
3119
啄木币
13806
鲜花
633
只看该作者 7楼 发表于: 2006-03-20
感觉到了压力!
离线yjmforever
发帖
352
啄木币
1902
鲜花
68
只看该作者 8楼 发表于: 2007-07-18
顾东风教授2005年就发了NEJM
离线victory001
发帖
206
啄木币
1564
鲜花
75
只看该作者 9楼 发表于: 2007-07-18
感觉这文章好偏流行病和公共卫生方面,一个搞临床的发这方面的文章也不能代表他临床水平高,
中国人在外面发的基本都是基础方面的文章,真正临床的文章几乎没有,这也不是好现象。
离线running99
发帖
519
啄木币
249
鲜花
43
只看该作者 10楼 发表于: 2007-07-18
顾东风教授,刚来的时候就是他来给做的讲座,感觉人虽然实力牛,但很谦虚,作风也很讲实效。
记得做完讲座后还对我们说“耽误大家时间了,听我讲了这么久”
离线yjmforever
发帖
352
啄木币
1902
鲜花
68
只看该作者 11楼 发表于: 2007-07-19
引用第9楼victory0012007-07-18 23:38发表的:感觉这文章好偏流行病和公共卫生方面,一个搞临床的发这方面的文章也不能代表他临床水平高,中国人在外面发的基本都是基础方面的文章,真正临床的文章几乎没有,这也不是好现象。


顾教授本来就不是搞临床的,现在主攻遗传流行病学和临床流行病学
离线yjmforever
发帖
352
啄木币
1902
鲜花
68
只看该作者 12楼 发表于: 2007-07-19
JAMA和NEJM上的两篇文章用的是同一资料的不同角度分析的。都是1991年全国高血压调查,然后99年随访的资料。

其实NEJM的文章并不是说顾教授用的方法有多新,关键是该资料是覆盖全国的资料,近百万人群的资料,这么大的样本量很难获得。所以得出的结论也就有说服力。
离线ambers
发帖
1487
啄木币
312
鲜花
330
只看该作者 13楼 发表于: 2007-07-19
LS的知道的不少啊。。。。。。。。。。
离线yjmforever
发帖
352
啄木币
1902
鲜花
68
只看该作者 14楼 发表于: 2007-07-19
引用第13楼天使泪痕2007-07-19 07:07发表的:LS的知道的不少啊。。。。。。。。。。


这两篇文章我看了不下几十遍,呵呵
快速回复
限100 字节
 
上一个 下一个